Next: Inelastic Collisions
Up: Collisions in 1 Dimension
Previous: Collisions in 1 Dimension
Contents
are the two relations that follow from momentum and energy
conservation (in the one, e.g. - x - direction). Assuming we know
and
, can we find
and
?
Yes. There are three ways to proceed. One is to directly solve these
two equations simultaneously. This involves solving an annoying
quadratic and we will avoid it. The second is to note that we can do
the following rearrangement of the energy and momentum equations:
(from energy conservation) and
 |
(4.45) |
(from momentum conservation). When we divide the first of these by
the second, we get:
or the relative speed of approach before a collision equals the
relative speed of recession after a collision.
Although it isn't obvious, this equation is independent from the
momentum conservation equation and can be used with it to solve for
and
, e.g. -
(back substitute for
).
This is satisfying and easy to evaluate, but still hard to
understand. To understand the collision, it is easiest to put
everything into the CM frame, evaluate the collision, and then put the
results back into the lab frame! Let's try this:
In the CM frame,
so that the momentum conservation equation becomes:
Thus
and
. The
energy conservation equation (in terms of the
's) becomes:
so that we can conclude that
 |
(4.56) |
The + sign satisfies all the conditions, but means the the particles
``missed''. If they hit, their internal momenta relative to the CM
reverses! Thus:
 |
 |
 |
(4.57) |
 |
 |
 |
(4.58) |
 |
 |
 |
(4.59) |
 |
 |
 |
(4.60) |
| |
 |
 |
(4.61) |
| |
 |
 |
(4.62) |
which can be seen to equal the result above by inspection. It is,
however, a bit easier to understand!
Next: Inelastic Collisions
Up: Collisions in 1 Dimension
Previous: Collisions in 1 Dimension
Contents
Robert G. Brown
2008-01-29