|
March 26 |
March 27 |
March 28 |
March 29 |
March 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
miniterm begins |
|
|
| what
we'll do in class |
we
start dynamics (collision problems) |
||||
|
(always done before class) |
|
|
|
|
|
| in-class
presentation |
remember
to have something ready.... some issues to think about if you have already done all the problems in the back of the book: does L(u/c) L(v/c) = L(w/c)? (can two successive lorentz transformations, first to a frame moving at v/c compared to the initial one, and then to a frame moving at speed u/c relative to the second one, be replaced by a single lorentz transformation to a frame moving at speed w/c ? if so, what is w/c? can w/c be figured out by multiplying the two matrices above?) [this would be analagous to our proof that R(j) R(q) = R (q + j) from last friday] does L(u/c) L(v/c) = L(v/c) L(u/c) ? [as did R(j) R(q) = R(q) R(f) ? does order of operation matter?] |
||||
|
homework (by 5 pm) |
this problem is the culmination of our time dilation, length contraction, time-sequential picture problems of the first 3 weeks of the course... although i am encouraging those of you who have already shown mastery of these problems on previous assignments to use the lorentz transformations procedures on this set, i am happy to have those who havent (yet shown mastery) use the old processes.... everyone really needs to get this problem perfect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 19 |
March 20 |
March 21 |
March 22 |
March 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
lab is
now postponed we will spend all day in class trying to catch up yesterday we didnt get to talk about the yesterday's reading (relativistic velocity additions), so please make sure that you are on top of that for today's class |
|
|
what we'll do in class |
talk about the rotation of coordinates (see last friday) |
rotational transformations, and their relevance to the lorentz transformations.... why the distance between two objects in three-space does not depend on the coordinate system |
how to do relativistic velocity addition problems |
organize the formulas we are supposed to be using for mass, momentum, kinetic energy, etc. for non-moving particles, for moving particles with mass, and for particles moving at light speed |
figure out how energy and momentum transform understand where the formula for relativistic mass (gm) comes from |
|
(always done before class) |
on the Lorentz transformations be able to explain in class exactly how the time dilation equation and the length contraction equation that we have been using to do our homework porblems follow from the lorentz transformations |
be able to explain in class exactly how the time dilation equation and the length contraction equation that we have been using to do our homework porblems follow from the lorentz transformations (yes, we will review what we did in class yesterday, just to make sure everybody got it) |
pp 28-30 on the velocity transformations |
know what the transformed mass, kinetic energy, and rest energy look like and how Serway came up with them... was he concinving? |
plus the example they refer you to for proof of relativistic mass = gm |
in-class presentation |
if a 2x2 matrix has elements a b c d what are the elements of its inverse? |
find a matrix a) that reproduces the lorentz transformation equations b) that has an inverse equal to its transpose the column vector will contain Dx (delta x) in one slot and something proportional to cDt (c times delta t) in the other slot |
show that a rotation of angle q (theta) followed by a rotation of angle j (phi) -- i.e., R(j) R(q) -- is equivalent to a single rotation of q + j, i.e., R (q + j) |
||
|
homework (by 5 pm) |
using the info given in cartoon video, 1) find v/c by doing a time dilation problem 2) find v/c by doing a relativistic doppler shift problem (ignore anything else i may have said in class about this homework) |
|
now due thursday: written and turned in: 1) 1(21) 2) (since no one showed this in class as I had hoped) for the muon problem (muon is created; muon reaches earth), calculate the quantity: (Dx)2 - (cDt)2 in both frames (earth and muon) and show that it is the same; you will have to re-calculate some of the quantities to more than the 2 or 3 significant figures we used in class; in any case, collect all of the data [Dx, Dt, and (Dx)2 - (cDt)2] in a 2-column table (as we did in class) as part of what you turn in consider the lifetime of the muon (acc to muon); the cloud-ground distance (in the earth frame) and g (gamma) factor to be of infinite precision (how many significant figures will you need to use for the calculated quantities? 5? 6? 7? ) |
(within 2 points), re-do it and show it to me in person by 4:30 pm today (this is the homework of 3/12/07) |
monday's homework: the earth/rocket problem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pick
up the 3rd edition of the book! |
|
March 12 |
March 13 |
March 14 |
March 15 |
March 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
block D: not to hand in, but to bring to class today: suppose we have two different coordinates with coincident origins, but whose respective axes are rotated relative to each other by an angle q (theta); refer to diagram on drew on the board in class tuesday find an expression for each of the coordinates in the rotated frame (x-bar, y-bar) in terms of the coordinates of the first frame (x, y) and q block C is not ready for this, because they are still having trouble with muon lifetimes, so they need to bring to class today ON PAPER: 1) the lifetime of each muon (fast and slow) according to each observer (fast and slow muon) 2) a statement about which muon dies first according to each of the muons I will check; if you know you're going to be absent, make sure you turn this in to my box before class, so you get credit |
not to hand in, but to bring to class today: suppose we have two different coordinates with coincident origins, but whose respective axes are rotated relative to each other by an angle q (theta); refer to diagram on drew on the board in class tuesday |
|
| what
we'll do in class |
lab E1 need calculator and calculator knowledge: read lab |
block D continues with doppler effect; Beck will tell us the egregious mistake; we have already addressed the egregious inconsistency block C has yet to start this; hopefully they will have found the mistake and inconsistency also |
|||
|
(always done before class) |
|
pp. 18-20 (this was supposed to be for yesterday) relativistic doppler effect (pp. 22-24); look for an egregious mistake and a glaring inconsistency |
(and tape into lab book on the inside front and back covers) |
relativistic doppler effect (pp. 22-24); look for an egregious mistake and a glaring inconsistency block D: twin paradox (pp. 20-21) |
(pp. 20-21) |
| in-class
presentation |
|||||
|
homework (by 5 pm) |
1(13) & remember: no numbers until the absolute last line of the problem.... and remember to solve for v/c, NOT v the return of Tonya and Reid: now Tonya stands at the back of the train, where the light also is... consider the two events" 1) light leaves the back of the train 2) light returns to the back of the train Since you know the time between the two events according to Tonya, you can do a time dilation problem to find the time interval according to Reid; but Reid can also solve the problem by doing a d-v-a-t, even though he doesnt initially know the length of the train, according to him. By equating the two method's answers, show that the train length according to Reid is g (gamma) times smaller than the length of train according to Tonya see the applet light_beam_clock.htm at T:\Student\kolena\Relativity_Physlets\ contents\s_relativity\sp_rel\ use the bottom light beam clock |
|
in # 51, remember to not use numbers till the very last line.... i would convert the distance given (in meters) to light seconds, of course (and remember, answers to odd problems are in the back of the boox |
|
in addition, for 15, calculate a numerical answer for qo (theta-sub-zero) if v/c = 0.95 and q (theta) = 30 degrees |
|
|
|
|
so make sure you have a lab book for today; your canary lab guide sheets should be taped in |
|
|
|
|
|
doppler effect applet |
|
|
|
March 5 |
March 6 |
March 7 |
March 8 |
March 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
bring a copy
of "The Complete Guide to Force Diagram Solutions" to class (and have read it?) |
(I don't want to send you back) |
|
| what
we'll do in class |
draw force diagrams and write net force equations for 1) a person sitting on a MGR 2) a plane flying back and forth from the Smoky Mts to a place directly south of it on the equator each problem will be solved from 2 reference frames: a) an inertial one (like we did in intro physics) b) a non-inertial one (the MGR and the earth in the two cases above) we will see how the equations of motion are the same no matter what the reference frame we will also learn the correct formulas for centrifugal and coriolis forces |
finish centrifugal/coriolis force exploration begin classifying physics quantities (simultaneity, position, velocity, time intervals, etc.) as to whether they are relative or absolute to different observers your book does one of these in the section 1(5) reading for today |
|||
|
(always done before class) |
|
"Rotataing Frames of Reference; Inertial Forces" |
the top of p. 16) photocopies of chapter 1 available by 4:30 pm today, outside my office |
"The Invariance of Perpendicular Lengths" AND finish section 1(5), i.e., pp. 16-17 |
|
| in-class
presentation |
|||||
|
homework (by 5 pm) |
|
|
(remember that there are see the applet Rel_of_Simultaneity.htm at T:\Student\kolena\Relativity_Physlets\ contents\s_relativity\sp_rel\ |
|
thrown south from the pitcher's mound to home plate, at a reasonable speed, in Durham (or the displacement of any sports ball, kicked, thrown, or hit) document the numbers you assume to start the problem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|