Quantum Effects
2
Atoms and
Their Constituents
-
Prior to the 1890's those scientists
who believed in the reality of atoms also believed them to be the most
"elementary" particles of nature. They could be combined into molecules,
but they could not be further subdivided.
-
The discovery of radioactivity in 1895,
followed shortly by studies showing that these phenomena involve a transmutation
of elements, shook this belief in the atom as fundamental.
-
Thompson's elucidation of cathode rays
(1897) as beams of tiny charged particles suggested that these particles
(electrons) come out of atoms, implying that atoms are not elementary after
all.
-
In 1909 Rutherford showed that the atom
in fact consists of a heavy but very small nucleus carrying positive charge,
surrounded by electrons.
-
By about 1912 it was clear what atoms
are made of. It was not clear how they manage to hold together in a stable
configuration.
Back to top
Rutherford's
Model of the Atom
-
The data from scattering of a
particles (which are given off in radioactive decay of heavy elements such
as radium) from a gold foil showed a surprising effect that occurred occasionally.
Sometimes the incident a
particle was deflected nearly completely backward.
-
If the charge and mass in the gold atom
is distributed more or less uniformly over its volume, the a
particle should suffer a deflection of no more than a few degrees.
-
Rutherford interpreted the data as showing
that if fact most of the mass and (perhaps) all of the positive charge
in the atom are concentrated in a very small volume. He named this massive
positive object the nucleus.
-
If the incident a
particle collides essentially head on with this nucleus, then significant
deflection can occur.
-
Rutherford showed that all of the cases
of large angle deflection could be explained on his assumption.
-
He thus proposed a model in which all
of the atom's positive charge and nearly all of its mass are located in
the nucleus. The electrons move around in the remaining space occupied
by the atom, roughly like planets around the sun.
Back to top
Difficulties
With Rutherford's Model
-
There was a serious problem with this
"planetary" model of the atom: radiation.
-
According to classical elctrodynamics
an accelerated charge radiates, at a rate proportional to the square of
the acceleration.
-
An electron orbiting about the positive
nucleus, held in place by the Coulomb force, will be continually accelerating
as the direction of its motion changes. It should therefore continually
radiate, losing energy and moving to a smaller orbit.
-
A simple calculation shows that an electron
starting from a circular orbit of the size of an atom will spiral into
the nucles by radiating away its energy in a very short time, about 10-8
s. This makes stability of the atom impossible.
Back to top
Bohr's Theory
of the Rutherford Atom
-
In 1913 Bohr, who had worked for a time
in Rutherford's lab and knew about the data and Rutherford's ideas, proposed
a theoretical framework to apply to the atom.
-
He had no explanation for the absence
of the classically predicted radiation when the atom is in a stable state.
He therefore asserted that classical electrodynamics does not apply at
the atomic level.
-
On the other hand, atoms do radiate sometimes
— this is the principal source of our light. But this radiation is often
confined to discrete frequencies, called spectral
lines. Radiation at frequencies between these "lines" does not
occur.
-
Bohr asserted that this radiation consists
of Einstein's photons, with frequency determined by their energy accourding
to E = hf.
-
The discreteness of the spectrum suggests
that the energies available must be a discrete set. Bohr argued that this
means the atom's own energy must be restricted to discrete "levels" and
that the photon emitted when the atom moves from a higher level to a lower
one will have energy Ei - Ef = hf.
-
The allowed energy levels are those of
stationary
states, in which the atom can exist without radiating, at least
for some time.
Back to top
What
are the Stationary States?
-
Now Bohr needed a way to determine which
states would be stationary.
-
In this he was aided by the work of spectroscopists
since the mid-19th century. They had catalogued the frequencies of the
spectral lines of numerous atoms, especially hydrogen (which by 1913 was
known to contain only one electron and thus be the simplest atom). The
data on frequencies had been shown in many cases to be differences between
a certain set of numbers, called "terms".
-
In the 1880's Balmer had proposed a formula
for the "terms" of hydrogen. It was this formula that Bohr used to find
his theoretical framework.
-
Bohr's papers contained several arguments
to support his choice of stationary states. The one that had lasting significance
was a new "quantum" postulate concerning angular momentum.
-
He proposed
the restriction that for the stationary orbits the angular momentum must
be a multiple of h/2p,
where h is Planck's constant.
-
This was a radically
new use of the quantum idea.
Back to top
Details
of the Stationary States for Hydrogen
-
Bohr assumed that hydrogen consists of
a single electron orbiting a nucleus with a large mass and charge +e. At
first he considered only circular orbits.
-
For such an orbit the total energy (non-relativistic)
is
where r is the orbit radius, v its speed, m the electron
mass, -e its charge, and k (in SI units) is 1/4pe0.
-
For circular motion the radial force
is
so we can write the total energy as

-
Now we apply Bohr's postulate about the
angular momentum:
.
This marks the introduction
into physics of the number n, the first of many quantum
numbers.
-
Solving for v from the radial force equation
and doing a little algebra we find
-
This formula gives the radii of the allowed
orbits. Assuming that the smallest radius is not zero, we must start the
sequence with n = 1. The the radii are multiples of the Bohr
radius:
(Here we have introduced the standard symbol "h-bar"
to stand for h/2p.) Numerically this radius
is about 0.053 nm.
-
The allowed radii are thus
-
This then gives the allowed energies:
where

-
Numerically we find E1 = -13.6 eV.
Back to top
The Spectrum
of Hydrogen
-
Using these formulas for the energy levels, Bohr could then
predict the frequencies of light emitted when the atom moved from a higher
level to a lower one. He simply used
-
To reproduce the lines that Balmer had accounted for in his
formula, one takes the final state to be n = 2. These frequencies are in
the visible region. For example, with initial state n = 3 we find
Using h = 4.14 ¥
10-15 eV-s we find f = 4.59 ¥
1014 Hz, which corresponds to a wavelength l
= 656 nm, so this is the red line in the spectrum, called Ha
by the spectroscopists. Other lines observed in the Balmer series come
from higher initial states.
-
As technology improved so that spectra
in the ultraviolet and infrared could be measured, other lines of hydrogen
were compared to Bohr's formulas. They all conformed, within errors.
Back to top
Weaknesses
of Bohr's Theory
-
The procedure proposed by Bohr was a
hybrid, with one foot in classical physics (orbits, classical formulas
for angular momentum, etc.) and one in quantum physics (photons, "quantized"
angular momentum).
-
Bohr could give no convincing reason
why those states with quantized angular momentum were the stationary ones.
-
Attempts to apply this procedure to atoms
with more than one electron went nowhere. Nor could it be used to understand
molecular structure.
-
Nevertheless, it was a large step forward
in our understanding of how different the laws at the microscopic level
are from those of classical physics.
Back to top
The
Correspondence Principle
-
To attempt to justify his angular momentum postulate, Bohr
gave another argument which has outlived his theory.
-
Consider the transition in an atom from a state with a large
value of n to the next lower number, n-1. The emitted frequency is given
by
(Here we have used w
= 2pf.)
-
What does all this mean? What we have shown is that for large
values of the quantum number n the orbital angular frequency is the same
as the frequency emitted in a transition to the next lower level.
-
But in classical physics a charge orbiting with a given orbital
angular frequency will necessarily emit light with that same frequency.
Thus Bohr's quantum description agrees with classical theory for large
values of n.
-
This would not have occurred if we had used a different rule
concerning the angular momentum.
-
Bohr took this situation to be an example of a general rule,
which he called the Correspondence Principle:
The quantum description of nature
and the classical description must merge into each other when systems of
"classical" size are considered.
-
In practice, situations with large
quantum numbers are considered to be of classical size.
-
The importance of this principle is
that it serves a a guide when guessing the correct quantum description
of a situation.
Back to top
The Franck-Hertz
Experiment
-
In 1914 an experiment by Franck and Hertz
demonstrated directly the existence of discrete energy levels in atoms.
-
In essence this experiment, in which
electrons were made to collide with atoms of Hg, looked at cases where
the atom absorbs some of the kinetic energy of the electron by moving its
own energy to a higher state. This loss of energy by the electron shows
up as a decrease in current reaching a negative plate in the vacuum tube
containing the Hg gas.
-
As the initial energy of the electrons
is increased, the current should rise. This was observed, but there were
dips in the curve, indicating electron energies where the collisions with
Hg atoms were inelastic, with the atom absorbing most of the electron energy.
-
The fact that these dips were spaced
apart showed that the atom is especially able to absorb electron energies
of certain amounts, but not other amounts.
-
This is easy to understand if it is assumed
that the internal energy state of the atoms consists (as Bohr said) of
discrete levels. The electron which has just the right energy to move the
atom from one level to another will engage in the inelastic collision.
Electrons with other energies will not, and their collisions will be elastic.
(Since the atom is massive, an elastic collision leaves the electron energy
essentially unchanged.)
-
This simple experiment was very persuasive
that Bohr's idea of discrete atomic energy levels is correct.
Back to top